Mental health literacy and young people

This book examines creative approaches to mental health literacy. In the wake of COVID-19, and the onslaught of major war breaking out once again in Europe, the mental health of young people is at stake, with increasing numbers struggling with anxiety, depression, and other psychological challenges. It provides an accessible, lively, and creative entry point to mental health literacy and young people at a time of unprecedented challenges to their psychological health, with increased uncertainty about physical survival, rising cases of anxiety, depression, stress, and loneliness, all compounded by hampered social connectedness, losses in educational attainment, and concerns for future employment opportunities. The book introduces the reader unfamiliar with this concept to the ways that the creative arts not only contribute to positive mental health, but may also be the best chance to advance understanding of and responses to mental health challenges. The first part focuses on improving upstream knowledge about and responses to the difficult transitional period young people aged 17-24 face to reduce or counter the development of specific mental health disorders downstream. The second part examines downstream mental health literacy when particular disorders are already part of the lives of young people given that 50% of mental disorders begin by age 14 with 75% beginning by age 26. The book concludes with a short review of creative and coproductive strategies for advancing mental health literacy with and for young people upstream and downstream. It should be of interest to young people in secondary and higher education, parents, teachers, caregivers, coaches, clergy, and more. It will also be of interest to undergraduates, postgraduates, academic researchers, clinicians, educators, charitable bodies and the wider public interested in the mental health of young people and/or the application of creative practices to enhance health and wellbeing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

Impact of COVID-19 Lockdowns on the Activity and Mental Health of Older People in Indonesia: A Qualitative Study.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused detrimental impacts on different population groups throughout the world. This study aimed to explore the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic's mandatory lockdown protocols on individual and social activities and mental health conditions of community-dwelling older people in Jakarta, Indonesia. A qualitative design using one-on-one in-depth interviews was employed to collect data from the participants (n = 24) who were recruited using the snowball sampling technique. Data analysis was guided by the five steps proposed in a qualitative data analysis framework, including familiarisation with the data, identification of a thematic framework, indexing the data, charting the data and mapping and interpreting the data. The findings showed that before the COVID-19 outbreak participants engaged in different kinds of regular individual and social activities. However, the COVID-19 outbreak and its mandatory lockdown protocols significantly influenced both their activities and social life, which led to social disconnection and financial difficulties for them. COVID-19 outbreak, mandatory lockdown protocols, and the disruption of individual and social activities of the participants also caused mental health challenges to them, including feelings of loneliness, loss, sadness, stress, and anger. The findings suggest that there is a need for intervention programs addressing the socio-economic and mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on older populations to help them cope with these challenges. Future studies involving large-scale older populations to comprehensively understand COVID-19 impacts on them are recommended.

Post-Migration Stressors and Mental Health for African Migrants in South Australia: A Qualitative Study.

We conducted a qualitative study involving African migrants (n = 20) and service providers (n = 10) in South Australia to explore mental health stressors, access to mental health services and how to improve mental health services for African migrant populations. This paper presents the views and experiences of African migrants about the post-migration stressors they faced in resettlement that pose mental health challenges. The participants were recruited using the snowball sampling technique. To align with the COVID-19 pandemic protocol, the data collection was conducted using one-on-one online interviews through Zoom or WhatsApp video calls. Data analysis was guided by the framework analysis. The post-migration stressors, including separation from family members and significant others, especially spouses, imposed significant difficulties on care provision and in managing children's attitudes and behavior-related troubles at school. African cultural practices involving the community, especially elders in care provision and disciplining children, were not consistent with Australian norms, compounding the mental health stressors for all involved. The African cultural norms, that do not allow young unmarried people to live together, also contributed to child-parent conflicts, enhancing parental mental stressors. Additionally, poor economic conditions and employment-related difficulties were post-migration stressors that the participants faced. The findings indicate the need for policy and intervention programs that address the above challenges. The provision of interventions, including social support such as subsidized or free childcare services, could help leverage their time and scheduled paid employment, creating time for effective parenting and improving their mental health and wellbeing. Future studies exploring what needs to be achieved by government and non-governmental institutions to support enhanced access to social and employment opportunities for the African migrant population are also recommended.

Barriers to healthcare access among U.S. adults with mental health challenges: A population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Having sufficient healthcare access helps individuals proactively manage their health challenges, leading to positive long-term health outcomes. In the U.S., healthcare access is a public health issue as many Americans lack the physical or financial resources to receive the healthcare services they need. Mental healthcare is especially difficult due to lingering social stigmas and scarcity of services. Subsequently, those with mental health impairment tend to be complex patients, which may convolute delivery of services. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the prevalence of barriers to healthcare access among U.S. adults with and without mental health challenges (MHC) and evaluate the relationship between MHC and no usual source of care (NUSC). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with data from the 2017-2018 National Health Interview Survey. MHC was categorized into three levels: no (NPD), moderate (MPD) and severe (SPD) psychological distress. Eight barriers were quantified; one was used as the primary outcome: NUSC. Multivariable logistic regression was used to quantify associations between these characteristics. RESULTS: The sample included 50,103 adults. Most reported at least one barrier to healthcare access (95.6%) while 13.3% reported NUSC. For each barrier, rates were highest among those with SPD and lowest for those with NPD. However, in the multivariable model, SPD and MPD were not associated with NUSC (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.83-1.01; 0.88; 0.73-1.07). Male sex (1.92; 1.78-2.06), Hispanic race/ethnicity (1.59; 1.42-1.77), and worry to afford emergent (1.38; 1.26-150) or normal (1.60; 1.46-1.76) healthcare were associated with NUSC. Having a current partner (0.88; 0.80-0.96), dependent(s) (0.77; 0.70-0.85) and paid sick leave (0.60; 0.56-0.65) were protective. CONCLUSIONS: The most prevalent barriers to healthcare access link to issues with affordability, and MHC exist more often when any barrier is reported. More work is needed to understand the acuity of burden as other social and environmental factors may hold effect.